Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA
Principal, Higher Secondary School of Art and Culture, Sarakhia – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's submission for examination center. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. process of examination handling. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. opposition to change examination center. (Para 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 8) |
| 5. future applications considered for next examinations. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner (Principal, Higher Secondary School of Art and Culture, Sarakhia, Dhenkanal) praying for a direction to the Council of Higher Secondary Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar (Opposite Party No.3) and the Controller of Examination, Council of Higher Secondary Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar (Opposite Party No.4) to allow the petitioner’s institution, i.e., Higher Secondary School of Art and Culture, Sarakhia, Dhenkanal for conducting the Higher Secondary Examination, 2026 of its students in its own institution like the previous years.
Taking the infrastructures and feasibility of the petitioner’s institution into account, the Opposite Parties had allowed/declared to the petitioner’s institution as an independent examination center for conducting the examinations of i
Changing an examination center mid-examination is impermissible due to potential disruption of examination administration processes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
