Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH, S.K.PANIGRAHI
Abana @ Maheswar Jena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details and case background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the investigation and prosecution case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. trial court's findings and evidence analysis. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments presented by appellant and respondent. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's review of evidence and principles on extra-judicial confession. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. conclusion on the sustainability of the conviction. (Para 16) |
| 7. final judgment and order. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
The Appellant, by filing this Appeal from inside the Jail, has called in question the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17th October, 2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadrak, in Sessions Trial No.42/192/85 of 2013-11 arising out of G.R. Case No.1107 of 2011 corresponding to Dhamnagar P.S. Case No.104 of 2011 in the Court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (S.D.J.M.), Bhadrak.
2. Prosecution Case:-
3. In course of investigation, the Investigating Officer (I.O.-P.W.14) examined the Informant (P.W.5) and recorded his statement and those of other witnesses under section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. He visited the spot, i.e, Bari land of Chan
Conviction based on unreliable evidence, particularly last seen theory and coerced extra-judicial confession, cannot meet the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt, and extrajudicial confessions require corroboration to be reliable.
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt, and extrajudicial confessions require corroboration to be credible.
Extra-judicial confessions must be corroborated and credible; lack of evidence undermined the conviction of the accused in a homicide case.
In order to sustain conviction must be complete and incapable of explanation of any other hypothesis than that of the guilt of the accused and such evidence should not only be consistent with the gui....
Circumstantial evidence must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, with clear, cogent connections to establish guilt; the accused's release is warranted when gaps exist in prosecution evidence.
Circumstantial evidence must establish a complete chain of guilt beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so warrants acquittal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
