Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI, B.P.SATAPATHY
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Umesh Chandra Mohapatra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to tribunal's orders regarding family pension. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on the eligibility of family pension for married disabled children. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's assessment of facts and procedural history. (Para 5 , 12) |
| 4. interpretation of pension rules and application of office memorandum. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 5. legal precedent regarding accrued rights in pension cases. (Para 15 , 16 , 20) |
| 6. court's conclusion on pension entitlement and modification of previous orders. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 7. final order regarding family pension entitlement. (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT :
The Union of India and its functionaries have filed this writ petition challenging the legality and propriety of the order dated 17.12.2021 passed in O.A. No. 260/00438 of 2020 under Annexure-1, as well as the order dated 19.05.2022 passed in M.A. No.260/00197 of 2022 under Annexure-2 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack.
2.1 The petitioners filed M.A. No. 260/00197 of 2022 seeking extension of three months time either to implement the order dated 17.12.2021 passed by the Tribunal in O.A. No. 260/00438 of 2020 or to challenge the same in higher court of law, as t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
