SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.PANIGRAHI, J.
Datum Micro Credit, Gundichar Nagar, Ganjam – Petitioner 
Versus
State Bank of India and Ors. – Opp. Parties
W.P.(C) No.5451 of 2022
Decided On : 23-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Bishnu Prasad Pradhan, Adv.
For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Ambika Prasad Mishra, Adv. Mr. S.N. Das, ASC

The Investigating Officer lacks authority under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. to freeze a bank account absent compliance with Section 102, violating procedural requirements and the petitioner's rights.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 91 and Section 102 - Freezing of bank account - Court held that freezing of the petitioner's bank account under the notice issued by the Investigating Officer was unauthorized as the petitioner was not an accused in any case, and the procedural requirements under Section 102 were not followed. (Paras 10-11)

(B) Right to life - The freezing of the bank account adversely affected the petitioner's right to livelihood, constituting a violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. (Paras 6, 15)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, a company service provider, challenged the freezing of its bank account based on a notice under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. despite not being an accused in related criminal cases. (Paras 2-3)

Findings of Court:
The freezing of the bank account was quashed, and the petitioner was directed to be allowed to withdraw the amount while executing a bond. (Para 15)

Issues: The court addressed whether the Investigating Officer had jurisdiction to freeze the bank account and the impact of this action on the petitioner's rights. (Paras 6, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the Investigating Officer lacked authority to freeze a bank account under Section 91 and failed to comply with Section 102, resulting in the revocation of the freezing order. (Paras 10-11)

Result: Writ Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to bank account freezing (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments against freezing authority (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court analysis on authority under cr.p.c. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. order to allow withdrawal and operate account (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

S.K. Panigrahi, J.

1. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner challenges the action of Opposite Party-Bank in freezing petitioner's Bank Account bearing No-00000034307905193 based on a notice issued under Section 91 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the IIC, Golanthara P.S, Berhampur. The Petitioner has further prayed for issuance of a direction to the Opposite Parties/Bank to allow him to withdraw the amount of Rs.12,71,324.95/- kept on hold in its Bank Account bearing No-00000034307905193 in State Bank of India, Konisi Branch.

I. FACTS OF THE CASE

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the substratum of matter presented before this Court remain that Datum Micro Credit is a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 and is a service provider (SP) for State Bank of India. Pursuant of agreement dated 29.09.2020 (Annexure-1), petitioner/company has been providing manpower services to the State Bank of India. It is pertinent to mention that the Petitioner company has not been arrayed as an accused in Golanthara P.S. Case No-122/2016, 202/2018 and 21/2019. There is no notice issued by the Investigating Officer of Golanthara vide P.S Case No- 122/2016, 202/2018 and 21/2019 to the petitioner either under Section 91 of Cr.P.C or under Section 102 of Cr.P.C. Bank Account bearing No-00000034307905193 stands in the name of petitioner's company and deals with GST and salary amount of staffs supplied by the petitioner's company.

3. While matter stood thus, pursuant to a notice dtd.17.09.2021 and 04.10.2021 (Annexure-4 Series) under Section 91 Cr.P.C, issued by the Investigating officer of Golanthara P.S Case No-122/2016, 202/2018 and 21/2019 to the Opp. Party, Bank Accounts Bearing No-00000034307905193 and 00000034307909834 were freezed. Petitioner had filed WP(C) No.30070 of 2021 before this Court with a prayer to defreeze both the Bank Accounts. By order dated 30.11.2021, this Court disposed of the aforesaid Writ Petition on the basis of submissions made by the learned counsel for the Bank, allowing the petitioner to operate Bank Account bearing No 0000034307905193 keeping frozen therein a sum of Rs.12,71,324.95/-. Liberty was granted to petitioner to file afresh upon conclusion of the enquiry or investigation and result thereof, if petitioner has relief for remedy there against, available in law. As the frozen amount includes three months GST amount and staff salary amount, petitioner by its letter dated 15.12.2021 (Annexure-2) requested the Bank to allow him to withdraw the frozen amount so that petitioner's company will be able to deposit the GST amount and pay the salary amount of his staffs.

4. In reply to the request letter, the Opp. Party/ Bank by its letter dtd.11.01.2022 (Annexure-3) intimated that amount of Rs.12,71,324.95/- has been kept on hold as per the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.(C) No.30070 of 2021 and the request for withdrawal can't be acceded to. Finding no other alternative, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition before this Court on 23.02.2022 for issuance of a direction to the Opp. Party/ Bank to allow him to withdraw the amount of Rs.12,71,324.95/- kept on hold in Bank Account No- 00000034307905193.

II. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER

5. It is submitted by Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that under Section 91 of Cr.P.C., the Investigating Officer summons the person to produce the document or other thing. On the summons issued under Cr.P.C Bank Account cannot be freezed. Admittedly Bank Account bearing No- 00000034307905193 stands in the name of petitioner's company i.e., "Datum Micro Credit". Petitioner's company i.e. Datum Micro Credit is not an accused in Golanthara P.S C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top