IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.PANIGRAHI
Rupesh Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Priyasha Goenka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. negligent driving led to the opposite party's injuries. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner claims typographical errors in defense. (Para 3) |
| 3. opposite parties argue against amendment's allowance. (Para 4) |
| 4. court analyses amendment rules and previous admissions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. principles governing amendment of pleadings established. (Para 11) |
| 6. writ petition dismissed without merit. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
S.K. Panigrahi, J.
1. The Petitioner, in this Writ Petition, challenges the legality and propriety of the order dated 24.07.2018 passed by the learned 3rd Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar, in MACT (Misc. Case) No. 17 of 2012. By the said order, the Tribunal rejected the Petitioner’s application under Order VI, Rule 17 of the C.P.C., which sought to amend his written statement in the proceeding.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
(i) The Opposite Party and her friend, Payal Choudhury, were traveling towards Master Canteen Square from Sriya Talkies Square when an accident occurred due to the petitioner’s negligent and rash driving. The impact of the accident threw the Opposite Party a conside
Ram Niranjan Kajaria v. Sheo Prakash Kajaria
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal and Others v. K.K. Modi & Others
Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Sanjeev Builders Pvt. Ltd.
Amendments to written statements post-commencement of trial are generally not permitted if they withdraw admissions made, in accordance with legal principles of procedural law.
Amendment of Written Statement - Admissions made in the pleadings cannot be permitted to be withdrawn by amendment, but application may be made for explaining the clarification in the admissions.
Amendments to pleadings under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC should be liberally allowed unless they cause serious injustice or change the nature of the suit.
The judgment establishes the principle that while clarificatory amendments to pleadings may be allowed, attempts to withdraw admissions and set forth an entirely new case through amendments are imper....
Amendments to pleadings cannot withdraw clear admissions made earlier, as it would be prejudicial to the opposing party; such amendments must align with the CPC regulations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.