SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 328

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA
Juga @ Juge @ Jugeswar Bhoi – Appellant
Versus
Thipe Bhoiani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.C. Mohanty
For the Respondent: U.K. Samal

Table of Content
1. introduction and procedural history of the appeal (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. nature of the partition suit and its judgment (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. arguments on the abatement of appeal (Para 8)
4. court's reasoning on the abatement (Para 9 , 10)
5. conclusion and dismissal of the appeal (Para 11)

JUDGMENT :

1. This 2nd Appeal was heard from both the sides on 11.01.2024 on the sole formulated question as per Order No.12 dtd.18.12.2023, i.e., whether this 2nd Appeal shall abate as a whole for non-substitution of the LRs of the deceased respondent Nos.1, 8, 10 and 13 by the appellant or the abatement of appeal shall be limited to the deceased respondent Nos.1, 8, 10 and 13 only.

3. The appellant of this 2nd Appeal was the defendant No.1 before the Trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No.44 of 1983-I and he was the sole appellant in the 1st Appeal vide T.A. No.4 of 1995.

5. As per the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court in the suit vide T.S. No.44 of 1983-I, that suit vide T.S. No.44 of 1983-I was decreed preliminarily for partition on contest against the defendant No.1(appellant of this 2nd Appeal) and ex-parte against the rest of the defendants.

7. In that suit vide T.S. No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top