Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Rosalyn Behera – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of domestic violence case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's analysis on allegations and summons (Para 3 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments regarding absence of specific allegations (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. legal standards for issuing summons in domestic violence cases (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. quashing of proceedings against the petitioner (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT :
Sashikanta Mishra, J.
The Petitioner is one of the Respondents in C.M.C. No.155/2023 of the Court of learned J.M.F.C. (O), Bhubaneswar filed by the present Opposite Party No.2 under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Do0mestic Violence Act, 2005 (“PWDV Act”). In the present application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. the Petitioner prays for quashment of the said proceedings on the ground that no case is made out against her.
2. The facts, relevant only to decide the present application are that the aforementioned application under Section 12 of the PWDV Act was filed by the present Opposite Party No.2 as aggrieved person claiming reliefs under Sections 18 ,19,20 and 22 of the Act against the Petitioner and others. It is stated that the aggrieved person married Debadutta Behera on 8th February, 2013 as per Hindu custom
For domestic violence proceedings, courts must find specific allegations against individuals; general claims are insufficient to hold parties accountable.
Prima facie allegations of domestic violence under the PWDV Act do not require detailed particulars of every single act of cruelty, and the veracity of the allegations would depend upon the evidence ....
The veracity of the allegations in a complaint petition under the PWDV Act depends on the evidence to be adduced by the complainant, and it is not necessary for the complainant to cite detailed parti....
Distant relatives residing in a separate district may not be necessary parties in a domestic violence proceeding under the PWDV Act, and their presence may not be required for adjudication.
Prima facie satisfaction of the Magistrate about instances of domestic violence is sufficient for the issuance of summons under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
Domestic violence proceedings under the DV Act require established shared household and direct domestic relationship; mere familial ties are insufficient for liability.
High Courts must adopt hands-off approach quashing DV Act proceedings under Section 482 CrPC, interfering only for gross illegality/abuse; treat allegations as true, avoid mini-trials or evidence ass....
The court established that credible evidence is essential in domestic violence cases, and significant delays in filing complaints can undermine the validity of such claims.
Proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act initiated with vague allegations and lacking material particulars constitute an abuse of process and are unsustainable in law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
