Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
V.NARASINGH
Raghunath Tripathy – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner –cum-Secretary, Department of Cooperative – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's retirement details under challenge. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arbitrariness in treating employee differently discussed. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. comparison with state employees contested. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. service rules relevant to retirement age emphasized. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. confirmation of retirement age amendment process. (Para 19 , 20 , 22 , 24) |
| 6. eligibility disparity between employee groups clarified. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. court's limited intervention in policy matters noted. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. petitioner's claim to extended retirement denied. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner. who was working as a Junior Supervisor in the office of the Berhampur Co-operative Central Bank, (hereinafter referred to as “the Central Bank”, for convenience of ready reference) has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the order passed by the Central Bank by order dated 23.07.2014 at Annexure-4, intimating him about his retirement of service with effect from 30.09.2014, on attaining the age of superannuation of 58 years and petitioner has also sought for a direction to the Opposite Party No.2 (The Registra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
