IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
A.K.Mohapatra, J.
K. Sukhjit Singh - Appellant
Vs.
State of Odisha - Respondent
CRLREV No. 213 of 2022
Decided On: 24-08-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the freezing of bank accounts. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court’s directive for resolution of account status. (Para 7 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. analysis of power to freeze accounts under law. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final order disposing of the revision. (Para 16) |
1. This criminal revision has been filed at the instance of the accused petitioner in Special G.R. Case No. 22 of 2021 pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri arising out of M.V.79 P.S. Case No. 09 of 2021, challenging the impugned order dated 18.01.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri in Misc. Case No. 01 of 2022 arising out of above noted Special G.R. Case. By virtue of the impugned order, learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri, while considering the application of the accused petitioner, which has been filed with a prayer for a direction to the Investigating Officer to reactivate the Bank account No. 6376457670 at Indian Bank, Rajamundir Branch and Bank account No. 98390100002370 at Rajamundir Branch has rejected such application.
2. The prosecution case, in gist, is that at about 2.00 A.M. on 31.01.2021, the informant found one Red coloured Tractor and trolly without registration and one motorcycle and one Red coloured Creta Car parked in a suspicious manner on the road leading to Shanti Nagar from M.V.-72. On search, the police party detected with contraband ganja measuring 1411 Kgs. were kept in such vehicles. It is further alleged that on seeing the police party, the accused persons fled away from the spot taking advantage of the darkness of the night. However, the police party could manage to apprehend six accused persons, namely, Gopal Ray, Bikram Mandal, Mahananda Haldar, Mohammed Gulrez, Surjit Singh and Rajesh Mandal. It is further alleged that the aforesaid contraband ganja was recovered from the exclusive and conscious possession of the above named accused persons. It is further alleged that in course of investigation, it was found that Bank accounts have been used in the alleged crime and further two numbers of Musk Deer were found in the house of the accused, which was subsequently seized by the police. Subsequently, the police has also arrested the accused Mrinal Mandal and accused Krishan Kanta Ballav. On search, the police recovered one VIVO 1818 Mobile Phone, one l-Tel 2163 Mobile phone and cash of Rs. 2,00,000/- (rupees two lakhs) from the possession of accused, namely, Krishan Kanta Ballav. It is further stated that on being asked, the said accused Krishan Kanta Ballav stated before the police that he was carrying the aforesaid cash amount for purchase of contraband ganja from the remote areas of Chitrakonda for sell in Andhra Pradesh. Accordingly, the said Krishan Kanta Ballav arrested for the alleged commission of offence under Sections 20 (b)(ii)(C)/25/27-A/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. Heard Mr. J.K. Panda, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. M.K. Mohanty, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State.
4. It is submitted by learned' counsel for the petitioner that during investigation of the case, the Bank account of the accused has been seized by the Investigating Officer bearing No. 98390100002370 Bank of Baroda and Account No. 6376457670 Bank of India both are kept at Rajmundir Branch. It is also alleged that the Hyundai Creta car bearing Registration No. AP-05-ES-4646 was also seized by the police in connection with the present case.
5. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that so far as the Bank accounts which have been seized by the Investigating Officer are concerned, it is stated that the same have no nexus with the alleged crime. However, for reasons best known to the Investigating Officer, such Bank accounts have been freezed in connection with the present case. He further contends that the pe
Law permits freezing bank accounts linked to alleged crimes, but proper legal procedure including post-trial confiscation must be followed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the legality of freezing bank accounts under Section 102 Cr.P.C. and the applicability of this provision in the context of the case.
Acquittal from drug charges leads to mandatory release of seized properties under Section 68Z(2) of the NDPS Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the procedure for freezing bank accounts under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, specifically Section 25, is directory in nature....
Seizure of assets under S.102 CrPC requires compliance with statutory provisions and cannot be based solely on suspicion.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to follow the procedure laid down under Sec. 102 Cr.P.C and the need for sufficient evidence to support the freezing of a bank acco....
Taxation - De-freezing of accounts - Illegal gratification/kickbacks in bank account - Amount which does not relate to impugned transaction alongwith interest accrued thereon be directed to be releas....
The court established that a bank account can be frozen under suspicion of criminal activity, and failure to report the freeze to the Magistrate does not invalidate the action.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.