SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 749

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
A.K.Mohapatra, J.
K. Sukhjit Singh - Appellant
Vs. 
State of Odisha - Respondent
CRLREV No. 213 of 2022
Decided On: 24-08-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : J.K. Panda, S.S. Dash and B. Kama
For the Respondents: M.K. Mohanty, Additional Standing Counsel

Law permits freezing bank accounts linked to alleged crimes, but proper legal procedure including post-trial confiscation must be followed.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 102 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 51, 52, 62, 63, 68

(B), 68(F) - Application for defreezing of bank accounts - Petitioner argued that accounts have no nexus with the crime; Sessions Judge rejected the application - Court found that Investigating Officer possesses the authority to freeze accounts related to suspect properties - Judgment referred to did not support the case for defreezing due to its context - Directions issued for Investigating Officer to reconsider defreezing request within stipulated time. (Paras 6, 8, 15)

Facts of the case:
The applicant faced prosecution for involvement in a narcotics case, leading to the freezing of his bank accounts based on alleged links to the crime. The petitioner contested the freezing of the accounts, claiming lack of relevance to the case and asserting their necessity for conducting business.

Findings of Court:
Court ruled that the Investigating Officer can freeze relevant accounts during investigation but the trial court must ensure proper procedure for potential confiscation only after trial completion.

Issues: The primary issue was the validity of the freezing of the bank accounts connected to the accused and its impact on the petitioner's business.

Ratio Decidendi: Court emphasized that while police can freeze accounts directly linked to alleged crimes, they must ensure adherence to legal procedure regarding the assessment, including the competent authority's confirmation.

Result: Criminal revision is disposed of with directions for the Investigating Officer to act on the defreezing application appropriately.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding the freezing of bank accounts. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court’s directive for resolution of account status. (Para 7 , 14 , 15)
4. analysis of power to freeze accounts under law. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. final order disposing of the revision. (Para 16)
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Mohapatra, J.

1. This criminal revision has been filed at the instance of the accused petitioner in Special G.R. Case No. 22 of 2021 pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri arising out of M.V.79 P.S. Case No. 09 of 2021, challenging the impugned order dated 18.01.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri in Misc. Case No. 01 of 2022 arising out of above noted Special G.R. Case. By virtue of the impugned order, learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri, while considering the application of the accused petitioner, which has been filed with a prayer for a direction to the Investigating Officer to reactivate the Bank account No. 6376457670 at Indian Bank, Rajamundir Branch and Bank account No. 98390100002370 at Rajamundir Branch has rejected such application.

2. The prosecution case, in gist, is that at about 2.00 A.M. on 31.01.2021, the informant found one Red coloured Tractor and trolly without registration and one motorcycle and one Red coloured Creta Car parked in a suspicious manner on the road leading to Shanti Nagar from M.V.-72. On search, the police party detected with contraband ganja measuring 1411 Kgs. were kept in such vehicles. It is further alleged that on seeing the police party, the accused persons fled away from the spot taking advantage of the darkness of the night. However, the police party could manage to apprehend six accused persons, namely, Gopal Ray, Bikram Mandal, Mahananda Haldar, Mohammed Gulrez, Surjit Singh and Rajesh Mandal. It is further alleged that the aforesaid contraband ganja was recovered from the exclusive and conscious possession of the above named accused persons. It is further alleged that in course of investigation, it was found that Bank accounts have been used in the alleged crime and further two numbers of Musk Deer were found in the house of the accused, which was subsequently seized by the police. Subsequently, the police has also arrested the accused Mrinal Mandal and accused Krishan Kanta Ballav. On search, the police recovered one VIVO 1818 Mobile Phone, one l-Tel 2163 Mobile phone and cash of Rs. 2,00,000/- (rupees two lakhs) from the possession of accused, namely, Krishan Kanta Ballav. It is further stated that on being asked, the said accused Krishan Kanta Ballav stated before the police that he was carrying the aforesaid cash amount for purchase of contraband ganja from the remote areas of Chitrakonda for sell in Andhra Pradesh. Accordingly, the said Krishan Kanta Ballav arrested for the alleged commission of offence under Sections 20 (b)(ii)(C)/25/27-A/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. Heard Mr. J.K. Panda, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. M.K. Mohanty, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State.

4. It is submitted by learned' counsel for the petitioner that during investigation of the case, the Bank account of the accused has been seized by the Investigating Officer bearing No. 98390100002370 Bank of Baroda and Account No. 6376457670 Bank of India both are kept at Rajmundir Branch. It is also alleged that the Hyundai Creta car bearing Registration No. AP-05-ES-4646 was also seized by the police in connection with the present case.

5. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that so far as the Bank accounts which have been seized by the Investigating Officer are concerned, it is stated that the same have no nexus with the alleged crime. However, for reasons best known to the Investigating Officer, such Bank accounts have been freezed in connection with the present case. He further contends that the pe


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top