Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.SAHOO, CHITTARANJAN DASH
Raikishore Jena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case presented. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding witness credibility and provocation. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. evaluation of evidence from child witness. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. application of law on culpable homicide vs murder. (Para 10) |
| 5. conclusion supporting trial court's decision. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT :
The appellant Raikishore Jena faced trial in the Court of learned Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Jajpur in C.T. Case No.27 of 2009/11 of 2009 for the offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘I.P.C.’) on the accusation that on 25th September 2008 at about 1.30 p.m. in village Kuansha under Mangalpur police station in the district of Jajpur, he committed murder of his wife Benga @ Sinia Jena (hereafter ‘the deceased’).
The learned trial Court, vide judgment and order dated 27.11.2009, found the appellant guilty of the offence charged and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand), in default, to undergo R.I. for six months more.
Prosecution Case
2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 25.09.2008 at about noon, the appellant Raikishore Jena returne
The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC, asserting no grave and sudden provocation was present and emphasizing the reliability of the child witness alongside corroborative medical evide....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between culpable homicide and murder under the Indian Penal Code, and the assessment of the accused's knowledge and intention in....
Conviction under section 302 IPC upheld; child witness testimony deemed reliable despite contradictions, supported by medical evidence, and intoxication did not mitigate responsibility for homicide.
The reliability of a child witness's evidence, the need for corroboration, and the significance of medical evidence in establishing guilt in a murder case.
The court confirmed the conviction under Section 302 IPC, establishing that the evidence of murder was beyond reasonable doubt and rejecting claims of sudden provocation.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder hinges on the offender's intention, with insufficient evidence of intent leading to a reduced sentence.
Murder - Testimony of sole child witness - There is no age limit fixed for a person to be a competent witness. A child of tender age can also be a competent witness.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the evidence of eyewitnesses, the injured witness, and the medical evidence played a crucial role in establishing the guilt of the accused bey....
The court affirmed that evidence must establish intention to commit murder, ruling that provocation claimed by the accused did not mitigate the crime, reaffirming conviction under Section 302 IPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
