SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 528

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
S.K.Sahoo, J.
Kanhei Hira - Appellant
Vs. 
State of Orissa - Respondent
JCRLA No. 43 of 2009
Decided On: 02-12-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Jitendra Kumar Nayak, Amicus Curiae
For the Respondents:Arupananda Das, Addl. Government Advocate

The prosecution failed to prove the exclusive possession of contraband by the appellant, warranting the benefit of doubt and resulting in acquittal.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20(b)(ii)

(C) and Section 8(c) - Conviction for possession of ganja - The appellant was found with 21 kgs. 250 grams of ganja in a public bus, where official witnesses conducted a search. The trial court conviction was found faulty due to insufficient evidence linking possession conclusively to the appellant and concerns regarding the credibility of the prosecution witnesses. (Paras 3, 5, 8, 9)

(B) Criminal Law - Benefit of doubt - It was ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the exclusive possession of the contraband by the appellant and therefore, he should receive the benefit of doubt. (Para 9)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was accused of transporting ganja. He was arrested during a bus check when ganja was found in a bag beneath his seat. He denied ownership and the search's legality was contested.

Findings of Court:
The evidence did not establish that the appellant had exclusive possession of the ganja, leading to the conclusion that he was not guilty of the charges.

Issues: Whether the appellant was in exclusive possession of the ganja at the time of seizure and whether the search and seizure were lawful.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided that the prosecution did not satisfactorily prove that the ganja was in the exclusive and conscious possession of the appellant, rendering the conviction unsustainable.

Result: The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was acquitted of the charges.

Table of Content
1. appellant's arrest and seizure of ganja. (Para 1 , 2)
2. witness testimonies regarding search and seizure. (Para 4)
3. trial court's findings on evidence consistency. (Para 5)
4. arguments on witness credibility and investigation bias. (Para 6 , 7)
5. court's reasoning for acquittal based on prosecution failure. (Para 8 , 9)
JUDGMENT :

S.K. Sahoo, J.

1. The appellant Kanhei Hira faced trial in the Court of the learned 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Berhampur in 2(a) C.C. Case No. 9 of 2004(N)/T.R. No. 4 of 2007 for offence punishable under section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter 'N.D.P.S. Act') on the accusation that on 27.12.2004 night at about 12.30 a.m., he was found transporting 21 kgs. 250 grams of ganja at Podamari Forest Check Gate while travelling in O.S.R.T.C. bus plying from Motu to Bhubaneswar violating the provisions under section 8(c) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

2. The learned trial Court found the appellant guilty of the offence charged and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh), in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of two years.

2.1 The prosecution case, in short, is that on the intervening night of 26/27.12.2004 at about 2.30 a.m. while Sri Nalini Kumar Behera (P.W. 2), S.I. of Excise, E.I. & E.B., Berhampur was performing night patrolling duty along with his staff near Podamari Forest Check Gate, one O.S.R.T.C. bus bearing registration No. OR-02V-8467 was coming from Motu to Bhubaneswar and arrived at the Check Gate. The Excise Officials detained the bus and searched and during the search, it was found that the appellant was found sitting in seat No. 32 by keeping one white colour 'jari' bag beneath his seat and on being asked, he claimed it to be of his own and on further query on suspicion, he disclosed that it contained ganja. The appellant failed to produce any authority in respect of the contraband article. The bag was opened in presence of the witnesses and ganja was found in it and it was weighed, which came to 21 kgs. 250 grams. P.W.2 drew two samples of 50 grams each and sealed the sample packets as well as the packets containing bulk ganja, by using his brass seal and prepared the seizure list, supplied a copy of it to the appellant and arrested him and brought him in the jeep under custody, but the appellant escaped by jumping from the jeep near Kelua Chhak taking advantage of darkness. The seized properties were produced before the learned Special Judge and samples were sent to S.D.T.R.L. for chemical examination and on chemical analysis, the samples were opined to be containing ganja/cannabis as defined under section 2(iii)(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act. On completion of investigation, the prosecution report was submitted by P.W.2 under section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act against the appellant on 02.04.2007. The appellant who was absconding was arrested and produced in Court on 03.12.2006.

3. The defence plea of the appellant is one of denial.

4. In order to prove its case, the prosecution has examined as many as three witnesses.

P.W.1 Sudarsan Behera was the Excise Constable of E.I. & E.B., Berhampurand he stated about the search of the O.S.R.T.C. bus on 26/27.12.2004 night in between 2.30 to 3O' clock and stated to have recovered ganja from a bag, which was under seat No. 32 where the appellant was found sitting. He further stated about drawal of samples of ganja by P.W.2 and sealing of the sample packets so also bulk ganja packet and preparation of seizure list Ext. 1. He is a witness to the seizure. He identified the bulk ganja as M.O.I. and the sample packet' as M.O.II. He further stated that the appellant was arrested and brought along with the seized articles, but he escaped on the way by jumping out of the jeep and accordingly only seized articles were produced in Court.

P.W.2 Nalini Kumar Behera was the S.I. of Excise, E.I. & E.B., Berhampur,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top