Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Neelo Kontho @ Neelakantha Sadangi – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of prosecution and offenses (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of evidence and accusations (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments presented by the parties (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's analysis of procedural issues (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. evaluation of prosecution's evidence (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. final ruling and implications (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
The present Criminal Revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. is arising out of the judgment and order dated 03.01.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jeypore in Criminal Appeal No.03 of 2010, whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17.07.2009 passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Kotpad in 2(c) CC No.4 of 2001/T.R. No.543 of 2001 has been confirmed.
3. Accordingly, a complaint bearing 2(c) CC No.04 of 2001 was filed against the petitioners and three other co-accused persons for the alleged offence punishable under Section-7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1972 for alleged illegal possession of kerosene beyond permissible limit without any valid license.
5. P.Ws.1 & 3 were the independent witnesses. They had resiled from their earlier statements and did not support the prosecutio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
