Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ARINDAM SINHA, SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition pertains to management's perspective. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments against worker's engagement presented. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence and findings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court affirms the validity of the award. (Para 14) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT :
ARINDAM SINHA, J.
1. The writ petition is of the management. It was moved before this Bench on 9th November, 2022, when Mr. Mishra, learned senior advocate appearing on their behalf had submitted, there had been orders made by coordinate Benches, requiring affidavits being filed.
The requirement was because though there was direction for regularization of 43 workmen, no particulars could be provided by the union, at whose instance the reference was caused. His client has also filed affidavit. We reproduce below paragraphs 3 and 4 from our said order dated 9th November, 2022.
“3. We find, impugned is award dated 30th March, 2010. We have perused order of reference being whether 80 causal workers are entitled for regularization along with payment for equal pay on equal work. The tribunal found on facts, inter alia, 43 persons out of 80 workmen were seeking
The tribunal's findings on the regularization of workmen, based on their long service and lack of evidence from management, were upheld, illustrating the court's respect for factual determinations in....
The absence of proper contractor registration leads to a presumption of employer-employee relationship, entitling workmen to regularization in permanent jobs.
The court established that the mere payment of wages or bonuses does not create an employer-employee relationship if a valid contractor exists.
Establishing an employer-employee relationship is essential for regularization claims; contract-based employment does not create inherent rights to permanent status.
The court upheld the tribunal's finding that workmen failed to prove direct employment, thus validating the contract labor arrangement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
