Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Shyamsundar Majhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.S. Mishra, J.
This Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26.08.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Bhawanipatna, Kalahandi in Sessions Case No. 86/67 of 2008 [arising out of G.R. Case No. 184 of 2008 (TR No. 1455 of 2008)], whereby the learned trial court convicted the appellant under Section 324 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for six months.
2. This appeal is pending since 2009 and none appeared for the appellant on several dates of hearing. Therefore, vide order dated 12.03.2026, this Court requested Mr. Devi Batsalya Rath, who was present in Court to assist the Court in the capacity of Amicus Curiae and he has readily accepted the same and after obtaining the entire record, assisted the Court very effectively.
3. Heard Mr. Devi Batsalya Rath, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant and Mr. Ashok Kumar Apat, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
4. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 09.04.2008 at about 9.30 P.M. while the injured Bhismarathi Bag was watching T.V. at Lucky Hotel in front of his house, the accused came there and stabbed a knife to his belly. Fort
Court emphasized rehabilitation over punishment for first-time offenders under probation regulations, granting the appellant probation due to the lengthy trial and lack of prior offenses.
The court held that under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, first-time offenders guilty of lesser crimes may be granted probation, taking into account their conduct post-offense.
The need for conclusive evidence in criminal conviction is paramount, and rehabilitative measures may be preferable for lesser offenses.
The court affirmed the conviction under Sections 332 and 34 IPC for assaulting a public servant, prioritizing probation due to judicial delay and the appellant's reformed character.
The Court emphasized the reformative purpose of the Probation of Offenders Act, allowing convicted individuals to benefit from probation over imprisonment due to the long delay in proceedings and lac....
In cases of minor offenses with no criminal antecedents, courts may prioritize rehabilitation over punishment and grant probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, especially when significant tim....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC to determine culpable homicide not amounting to murder, and the extension of the benefit of proba....
The court emphasized the necessity for trial courts to consider the application of probation laws for first-time offenders and the requirement to provide reasons for not applying such provisions.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering probation for first-time offenders and the requirement for special reasons when denying such benefits, particularly under the Probation of Offenders ....
The court affirmed convictions for offenses related to obscene acts and outraging modesty while granting probation based on the absence of prior offenses and reformative principles underlining the Pr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
