IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Jagannath Panigrahi – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.S. Mishra, J.
The present Criminal Appeal, filed by the appellant is directed against the judgment and order dated 30.10.2009 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Berhampur in 2(a) C.C. No.6 of 2008(N), whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 20 (b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act and on that count, he is sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand), in default, to undergo further R.I. for one year.
2. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pradhan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Ms. Sarita Moharana, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 16.04.2008 at about 7.30 A.M., while K.K. Rao, I.I.C., E.I. & E.B., Berhampur, was performing patrol duty in the Utkal Ashram Road area of Berhampur Town along with his staff, he noticed the accused Jagannath Panigrahi moving suspiciously near the Ganjam Kala Parisada Gate, carrying a Jari bag in his hand. Entertaining suspicion, the Sub-Inspector of Excise detained the accused and called an independent witness, namely Tuna Nayak. After observing the procedural formalities, a search was
Non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 50 of the NDPS Act vitiates the prosecution case, entitling the accused to the benefit of doubt.
Search and seizure under NDPS Act must comply with Section 50 provisions, failing which accused are entitled to acquittal.
Procedural non-compliance under the N.D.P.S. Act, specifically regarding search and seizure requirements, vitiates the prosecution's case, leading to acquittal.
Non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, such as section 42(2) and section 50(4), can render the prosecution case doubtful and lead to acquittal.
Non-compliance with statutory provisions of the N.D.P.S. Act regarding search and seizure vitiates the prosecution case, warranting acquittal on grounds of reasonable doubt.
Non-compliance with the procedural requirements under Section 50 of NDPS Act is not applicable when contraband is recovered from a bag rather than a personal search.
Compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act is essential; failure to ensure due process can undermine the prosecution's case, resulting in acquittal.
Mandatory provisions under Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act must be followed strictly; non-compliance vitiates prosecution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.