Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
Binod Pandit @ Binod Kumar Pandit – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for quashing based on inherent jurisdiction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners claim false implications and lack of evidence. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court assesses the viability of criminal proceedings based on facts. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. consensual relationship negates criminality of allegations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court quashes fir and proceedings due to lack of evidence. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.
1. The Petitioners have instituted the present Criminal Miscellaneous Case under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court, seeking quashing of the FIR and the Criminal Proceedings arising out of P.S. Case No.408 of 2023, corresponding to C.T. Case No.1152 of 2023, pending before the learned J.M.F.C, Chandikhole.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
(i) On 04.07.2023 at about 9:30P.M., one Barsharani Ojha submitted a written report before the I.I.C., Dharmasala Police Station. In the said report, she alleged that Petitioner No.1 had been in a love relationship with her for a con
The court quashed the FIR and proceedings due to the consensual nature of the relationship, finding no prima facie evidence of any offence committed by the Petitioners.
The court established that consensual relationships, despite existing marriages, do not constitute criminal offences absent force or deception, allowing for quashing of wrongful prosecution.
A consensual relationship between adults who are fully aware of each other's marital status does not constitute an offense under the relevant laws, thereby quashing the related FIR.
The court ruled that a consensual relationship, despite marital status, does not constitute a criminal offense under applicable law, emphasizing mutual consent and awareness in all interactions.
The inherent powers of the court can quash criminal proceedings when the victim expresses no desire to proceed, especially following reconciliation and marriage, despite serious charges under IPC.
Rape, cheating and stalking – Criminal case cannot be quashed when there are serious factual disputes.
The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings requires exceptional circumstances; unproven allegations cannot justify termination at the outset, as factual disputes must b....
FIR alleging rape on false marriage promise quashed where consensual adult relationship sours, complainant married and ineligible to remarry, no evidence of vitiated consent or initial deceit.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
