SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 696

ORISSA HIGH COURT
PRADIP GOCHHAYAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


ORDER :

BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY, J.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that petitioner was engaged as a NMR/DLR in Jagatsinghpur Municipality w.e.f. 12.03.1992 and such engagement of the petitioner is prior to cut off date so fixed by the Finance Department in its Resolution dated 15.05.1997.

3.1. It is contended that even though petitioner continued as a DLR/NMR w.e.f. 12.03.1992, but instead of regularizing him as against the post of Sweeper on creation of 1999 posts in different Urban Local Bodies of the State by the Govt. in the Housing and Urban Development Department vide its communication dated 17.10.2012 under Annexure-1, petitioner was brought over to the work charged establishment vide order dated 22.01.2013. In the said order, petitioner’s name finds place at Sl. No.7.

3.2. It is further contended that even though petitioner is continuing as a DLR/NMR w.e.f. 12.03.1992 and as a work charged employee w.e.f. 22.01.2013 but petitioner is yet to get the benefit of regularization.

3.3. It is contended that claim of the petitioner to get the benefit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top