SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 706

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
Harish Tandon C.J., Murahari Sri Raman, J.
M/s. Monte Carlo Limited, Gujurat - Petitioner
Versus
The Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Central Zone-II, Odisha and another - Opposite Parties
W.P.(C) No.1412 of 2026
Decided On : 22-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anil Bezawada, Advocate
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sunil Mishra, Standing Counsel

The Writ Court reaffirms the necessity to pursue statutory remedies provided under the GST Act before seeking divorce from these provisions, emphasizing compliance with appeal conditions.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 73 and Section 107 - Petition challenging orders of tax authorities - Petitioner claims violation of principles of natural justice and seeks quashing of tax demands and orders by the authorities for being arbitrary and unconstitutional. - Petitioner contends failure to provide an opportunity of personal hearing and delay in processing rectification application. - Writ Court declines to entertain the petition and redirects the petitioner to pursue the alternative remedy under GST Act - All conditions for filing the appeal must be adhered to for its consideration. (Paras 2, 3, 5, 7, 8)

Findings of Court:
The Writ Court emphasizes that the GST Appellate Tribunal is the appropriate forum for addressing grievances against the orders under the GST Act.

Issues: The main issues involved were whether the tax authorities violated principles of natural justice and whether the appeal against the order rejecting the application for rectification was timely filed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that without expressing opinions on the merits, it is not proper for the Writ Court to intervene when a statutory remedy is available, highlighting the need for adherence to procedural requirements in filing appeals.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions to file an appeal according to statutory timelines.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's legal basis for extraordinary writ. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on the appeal’s validity and procedural issues. (Para 3)
3. opposition's argument against the writ petition. (Para 4)
4. hearing and review of case considerations. (Para 5 , 6)
5. court's directive for following statutory appeal procedure. (Para 7)
6. conclusion – no opinion on merits. (Para 8)

ORDER :

MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.

1. The petitioner by way of filing this writ petition beseeches to exercise power of extraordinary jurisdiction under the provisions of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer(s):

“The Petitioner, therefore, prays that your Lordships would be graciously pleased to admit this Writ Petition, call for the records, after hearing the parties, allow the same, issue writ/writs in the nature of certiorari/mandamus and/or any other further writ/direction to quash actions of the 1st Opposite Party, by way of passing the Impugned Appeal Order passed in Form GST APL-04 vide Ref No.ZD2109250201601 dated 17.09.2025, as arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to various precedents laid down in the subject matter and violative of Article 14, 300A and Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India;

And further be pleased to pass any other order/orders to quash the impugned actions of the 2nd Opposite Party by way of order passed in Form GST DRC 07 vide Ref No.ZD210424033515V dated 30.04.2024, without affording the petitioner with an opportunity of personal hearing, which is in violation of principles of natural justice, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unreasonable and also in violation of provisions of the Odisha State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

And further be pleased to pass any other order/orders to quash the impugned actions of the 2nd Opposite Party by way of Order vide Ref No.ZD21012501519R dated 17.01.2025 rejecting the application for rectification dated 06.04.2024 without providing the opportunity of personal hearing and without considering the submission of the petitioner arbitrary, unconstitutional, unreasonable, contrary to Section 161 of the CGST/OGST Act, 2017 and violative of principles of natural justice;

And further be pleased to pass any other order/orders to set aside or quash the recovery proceedings initiated in Form GST DRC 13 vide No.12748 dated 19.12.2025.

And further be pleased to pass any other order/orders as may be deemed just and proper;

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall, as in duty bound, ever pray.”

2. The petitioner, a private limited company, engaged in the business of works contract and rendering construction works, on the allegation of non-payment of tax as per the final audit report dated 10th June, 2023 in Form GST ADT-02 by the State Tax Officer, CT & GST Territorial Range, Jajpur, Odisha, was issued with Show- Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01, dated 17th November, 2023 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Keonjhar Circle, Jajpur, Odisha-opposite party no.2, responding to which reply was submitted on 12th December, 2023.

2.1. The opposite party no.2 passed an order confirming the demand of Rs.3,13,02,550/- (CGST of Rs.1,56,51,275/- + OGST of Rs.1,56,51,275/-) for the tax periods from April, 2018 to March, 2019 under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (collectively, “the GST Act”) vide order dated 30th April, 2024 in Form GST DRC-07. 2.2. The petitioner has filed an application on 6th May, 2024 under Section 161 of the GST Act for rectification of said order passed by the opposite party no.2, which was rejected vide order dated 17th January, 2025.

2.3. Being aggrieved by the order dated 17th January, 2025 passed by opposite party no.2, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Central Zone-II, Cuttack-opposite party no.1 under Section 107 of the GST Act on 21st February, 2025 in Form GST APL-01, which was admitted by the opposite

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top