SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 728

ORISSA HIGH COURT
JALEN SURIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


.JUDGMENT :

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition inter alia challenging rejection of his claim to get the benefit of 2(two) advance increment because of having the Degree qualification under Annexure-11.

4. It is contended that Petitioner was appointed as a Jr. Engineer vide order of appointment issued on 08.06.1999 under Annexure-1 series issued by the Chief Engineer, RWSS, Odisha, Bhubaneswar. It is contended that while so continuing, Petitioner acquired the B.E qualification in Civil Engineering vide Annexure-2 from Janardan Rai Nagar Rajasthan Vidyapeeth University, Udaipur(Rajasthan) India, the result of which was published on 25.06.2009.

4.1. It is contended that in view of the Resolution issued by the Finance Department on 14.05.2008 under Annexure-4, Petitioner on acquiring the Degree qualification became entitled to get the benefit of 2(two) advance increment. Resolution dt.14.05.2008 prescribing the guideline, more particularly Para-(iii) reads as follows:

(iii) The financial benefits on account of grant of advancement increments will be a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top