IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO, J.
Satyabrata Sahoo - Petitioner
Versus
Pabhasini Sahoo & Another - Opp. Parties
TRPC No. 36 of 2025
Decided On : 09-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petition for transfer of proceedings. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and harassment claims. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of jurisdictional provisions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 4. final decision and order regarding the transfer. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT :
MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO, J.
1. The petitioner-husband in the marriage is before this Court and has filed application under Section 447 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking transfer of the criminal proceeding, i.e., C.M.C. No.29 of 2025 filed by the opposite party-wife pending before the learned Judge, Family Court, Bargarh to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar. The said proceeding has been initiated under Section 144 of the BNSS , 2023 by the wife in the marriage seeking monthly maintenance from the husband.
Due to pendency of the present proceeding, the proceeding before the learned Judge, Family Court, Bargarh has been interdicted as prayer for adjournment to be sought for before the learned Judge, Family Court was allowed by interim order of this Court dated 19.06.2025.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner is heard at length and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties also responded in brief.
3. The territorial jurisdiction under which the application under Section 144 of BNSS , 2023 can be filed has been provided in the , i.e. Section 145 . The corresponding Sections in the Cr.P.C. were Section 125 & Section 126 respectively. For convenience of reference of , 2023 is reproduced herein.
“145. Procedure.— (1) Proceedings under section 144 may be taken against any person in any district—
(a) where he is; or
(b) where he or his wife resides; or
(c) where he last resided with his wife, or as the case may be, with the mother of the illegitimate child; or
xxx xxx xxx”
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioners before the learned Judge, Family Court, Bargarh, who are the present Opposite Parties in the present application reside at Bhubaneswar. In considered opinion by this Court that would be a matter of evidence and pleading before the learned Family Court, whether it would be an issue before the learned Judge, Family Court is beyond purview of the present application.
5. In view of the specific provisions contained in Section 145 of BNSS , 2023 the wife has a choice of filing of an application where she wants and the Section itself provides that a proceeding under Section 144 of , 2023 can be initiated against any person in any district.
6. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Opposite Parties that the averments made in the petition as well as the submissions made to support the prayer for transfer of the application are not correct. The wife opposite party has been harassed a lot. She has gone through immense difficulties and she has sought for intervention of Court to seek maintenance. The place of the initiation of the proceeding is in accordance with Section 145 of the BNSS , 2023. Therefore, he prays that the application be dismissed.
7. Having considered the rival contentions and considering the provisions contained in Section 145 of BNSS , 2023, in considered opinion of this Court, the application under Section 144 of , 2023 can be filed at the place where the wife wishes to file, i.e., at Bargarh. The prayer for transfer of the same on different grounds as contended such as convenience of the husband at Bhubaneswar and the minor child prosecuting at Bhubaneswar are not relevant considerations.
8. Accordingly, the petitioner has to be and is rejected.
9. However, it is observed that if the parties before the learned Judge, Family Court, Bargarh are so advised they can make application before the leaned Court for appearing by utilizing the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) facility if available, such as virtual hearing from remote location, etc. In case such application is made before the learned Court in seisin of the matter, the same
The wife may choose the venue for maintenance proceedings under the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the husband's convenience is not a valid basis for transfer.
The jurisdiction for maintenance claims under domestic violence law can be established at the temporary residence of the aggrieved person, allowing for simultaneous proceedings under various statutes....
The jurisdiction for domestic violence cases favors the residence of the aggrieved party, ensuring access to justice, as emphasized in the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.