SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 696

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Mrs. Birinder Khullar – Appellant
Versus
Maninder Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

1. The questions involved in this case is "(i) Whether the Rent Controller has any jurisdiction to extend time for tendering the provisional rent ?; (ii) whether the Rent Controller has jurisdiction to further extend time to tender rent in case of disagreement with the tenant on his application regarding re-assessment ?".

2. The landlord is in revision against the order dated 11.8.2010 by which the Rent Controller had extended time for tendering the provisional rent.

3. The brief facts of this case are that landlord filed petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for short the Act) on 27.10.2008 seeking ejectment of the tenant on the ground of personal necessity and non-payment of rent w.e.f. 1.9.2008 @ Rs. 14500/-. The tenant filed written statement contesting both the grounds of the ejectment and alleged that the rent was not Rs. 14,500/- but Rs. 7250/- per month and was not in arrears. The landlord filed replication, denying the averments made in the written statement and reiterated the contents of the ejectment petition. On 18.1.2010, the learned Rent Controller passed an order of assessment of provisional rent.



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top