SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 651

RAM CHAND GUPTA
Ami Chand – Appellant
Versus
Raj Pal – Respondent


Judgment

Ram Chand Gupta, J.

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the impugned order dated 23.9.2008, Annexure P1, passed by learned Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Rewari, vide which application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter to be referred as the Code) has been allowed directing the petitioner to affix ad valorem Court fee.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned trial Court.

3. Facts relevant for the decision 6f present revision petition are that petitioner-plaintiff has filed a suit for decree of declaration declaring him as owner in respect of land measuring 52/15 marlas being 885/1140 share of 57 kanal, as mentioned in para No.1 of the plaint and pattedar of the entire 57 kanal and that the plaintiff is in possession of the disputed land except Killa No.l8/2, 23/2, and that sale deed document no.211, dated 28.5.2004 and Tarak Patta document No.212 dated 23.82004 and pattanama document No.791 dated 5.9.2005 and the mutations on that basis in favour of the




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top