SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 191

RAM CHAND GUPTA
Mohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Bhim Sain – Respondent


Judgment

Ram Chand Gupta, J.

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 18.10.2010, passed by learned trial Court, vide which application filed by present petitioner-defendant no.1 for leading additional evidence was ordered to be dismissed.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned trial Court.

3. Brief facts relevant for the decision of present revision petition are that there is dispute between the parties to the suit with regard to a passage situated in North side of shop of petitioner-defendant no.l. The property of respondent no.2 and his mother Smt.Sewati Bai is situated in Northern and Eastern side of that disputed passage. Petitioner-defendant no.l had purchased this shop in question from Chunni Lal by way of registered sale deed No.557 dated 16.7.1976 while respondent no.2 and his mother had purchased the Northern Eastern side property from same Chunni Lal before the sale deed of petitioner. The shop of petitioner is two sides open having two doors in Northern side opening in the disputed pas


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top