SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2307

RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Mangal Sain Bansal – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.

1. For the reasons mentioned, delay of two days in refiling this appeal is condoned. CM disposed of. RSA No. 1707 of 2010 (O&M)

This is defendants second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the courts below whereby suit of the plaintiff-respondent for possession by way of specific performance of the agreement dated 13.03.2002 was decreed on deposit of balance sale consideration within two months with a further relief of permanent injunction restraining the appellant from interfering into the possession Of the appellant over the suit property.

2. As per the averments made in the suit, the appellant and the respondent were co-owners in possession in equal share in the suit property. On 13.03.2002, appellant entered into an agreement to sell the half share in the suit-property in favour of plaintiff-respondent for a consideration of Rs.7 lacs and received a sum of Rs.50,000/- as earnest money. An agreement to sell was reduced into writing and the defendant appellant had signed the same in token of its correctness. It was agreed that the possession of the half share in the suit property shall be delivered to the plaintiff-respondent by the appel

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top