SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 2203

HEMANT GUPTA, MOHINDER PAL
Rajwant Singh – Appellant
Versus
Food Corporation Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Hemant Gupta, J.

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority dated 27/28.6.2002, Annexure P-2 and the order in appeal dated 8.9.2004, Annexure P-5, whereby minor penalty of recovery of Rs. 36,513.40 was imposed upon the petitioner.

2. The petitioner was charge-sheeted on 26.2.2002 for causing loss to the respondent-Corporation while working at Naushera Pannuan during the years 1993-95. It was averred in the show cause notice issued to the petitioner that had adequate care been taken at the time of purchases/acceptance of stocks as per the laid down specification and after proper weighment as per the standing instructions besides preserving the stocks by conducting periodical supervision, aeration etc., the storage loss would have not been taken. Therefore, the notice contemplated that as to why a sum of Rs.1,09,594.18, as the loss suffered by the Corporation on account of financial impropriety, be not recovered from the petitioner.

3. In reply to the show cause notice, the petitioner asserted that he received only Stack No. 2-D/1 in the month of March, 1993 and he was on tour from Naushera Pannuan and that after returni
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top