SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 2160

HEMANT GUPTA, RAJIVE BHALLA, UMA NATH SINGH
Ram Kishan And Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Sheo Ram – Respondent


Judgment

HEMANT GUPTA, J.

1. The appellant, a mortgagee, filed a suit for declaration to the effect that they have become owners of the agricultural land measuring 13 Kanals 6 Marias by prescription. The case set up was that one Ami Chand son of Devi Singh mortgaged with possession agricultural land measuring 14 Bighas for a sum of Rs. 80/-with Hardhan Singh son of Jit Ram on 11-8-1903. During consolidation operations, the land measuring 13 Kanals 6 Marias was allotted in lieu of the original mortgaged land. The plaintiff claims to be in continuous possession of the suit land as mortgagees, whereas Munshi Ram, predecessor-in-interest of defendants was recorded as mortgagor. The mortgagees sought the declarartion on the ground that the suit land has not been got redeemed during the period of more than 60 years and, therefore, the defendants have lost all right, title and interest in it. Though the defendant denied the factum of mortgage, but the trial Court returned a finding that it was a case of usufructuary mortgage arid no period for payment of mortgage amount was fixed. It was observed that it is not the case of the plaintiff that they had made a demand for mortgage amount, whic









































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top