HEMANT GUPTA
Sat Narain – Appellant
Versus
General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Rohtak Depot – Respondent
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
1. The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated June 30, 1988 passed by the Authority under the Payment of Wages act, 1936 and the order in appeal dated January 18, 1989 against the aforesaid order.
2. The petitioner has filed a petition under sec. 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), claiming a sum of Rs.209/- on account of wages for the period April 1, 1985 to February 28,1986 and bonus for the year 1985-1986.
3. It was found by the learned Authority that two increments of the petitioner was stopped y the order of the disciplinary Authority i. e. General Manager, after a charge sheet was served upon the petitioner and the reply received. Therefore, it was found that deductions are not illegal. The said order,was affirmed in appeal as well.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the petition under Sec.15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 itself was not maintainable. It has been so held by this Court in the case of State of Punjab v. Dildar Singh, 2007 (1) Service Cases Today 202 and General Manager, Punjab Roadways, ropar V/s. Swaran Singh 2001 (3) RSJ 41
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.