SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(P&H) 3205

MAHESH GROVER
Rajjo – Appellant
Versus
Jawahar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

, J.

1. The plaintiff-appellant had filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction to say that she was owner in possession of the suit land and that the respondent, who was her brother, had managed to get a decree dated 15.11.1995 in civil suit No.1133 of 1995 titled as Jawahar Singh V/s. Smt. Rajjo by which he got the suit property in his favour. The said decree was sought to be challenged by her on the ground of fraud, misrepresentation and also on the ground that the same was not registered as it involved the alienation of immovable property of the value of more than Rs.100/- and there was no family settlement between them.

2. The respondent admitted the relationship of the plaintiff appellant with him and stated that she was his real sister and that mutual settlement had taken place between them and the suit land was given to him and that there was no misrepresentation or fraud and the decree was suffered of her own free volition.

3. On the pleadings of the parties, the trial Court framed the following issues: 1. Whether the plaintiff is the owner in possession of the suit property as pleaded? OPP 2. Whether the judgment and decree dated 15.11.95 passed in civil










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top