SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 404

V.M.JAIN
Darshan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

V.M.Jain, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 482, CrPC filed by the accused-petitioners, seeking quashment, of FIR No. 109 dated 11.3.1995, registered under Sections 420/465/468/471/120B, IPC, on the basis of compromise, effected between the parties.

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that on the complaint of Smt. Viney Bala, complainant-respondent No. 2, the aforesaid FIR was registered in Police Station City Yamuna Nagar. In the said FIR, lodged by Smt. Viney Bala, it was alleged that they had bought one house in Model Town in the year 1991 and it was lying vacant for many days and many persons used to take it for holding functions and they used to give them for use. It was alleged that Smt. Sushma had illicit relations with her husband, Subhash Chander, for a long time, about which she (Viney Bala) had no knowledge. It was alleged that because of the illicit relations, Smt. Sushma and her husband, Darshan Lal had taken the said house from her husband, Subhash Chander. It was alleged that after 8-10 days, her husband, Subhash Chander, told Smt. Sushma and her husband Darshan Lal, to vacate the said house and go back to their own house, which was lying vacant, as









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top