SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 280

G.S.SINGHVI, JASBIR SINGH
Haryana Builders Limited – Appellant
Versus
Haryana Urban Development Authority – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.SINGHVI, J.

1. Whether an allottee of the land belonging to Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short, HUDA) can avoid payment of the price in accordance with the conditions of allotment read with Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 (hereinafter described as the Act) and Haryana Urban Development Authority (Disposal of Land and Buildings) Regulations. 1978 (for short, the Regulations) is the question which arises for determination in this petition filed by the petitioner for quashing notice Annexure P, 13 dated 22-1-2001 issued by the Estate Officer. HUDA. Gurgaon (respondent No. 4) and order Annexure 17 dated 9-3-200) passed by the Administrator. HUDA. Gurgaon (Respondent No. 3).

2. For the purpose of deciding the above noted question, we may notice the relevant facts.

3. On the basis of highest bid given by its representative in the auction held in November,1996. The petitioner was allotted SCO site No. 24, Sector 14, Gurgaon at a price of Rs. 1,25,15,000/-. This was subject to the terms and conditions embodied in allotment letter Annexure P. 1 dated 27-11 -1996. After paying 25% of the price which included bid money of Rs. 13,00,000/-, the petitioners

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top