SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 831

R.C.KATHURIA
Rajinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Sukhbir Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This revision petition has been filed by Smt. Rajinder Kaur and Miss Surinder Kaur, petitioners, who were arrayed as defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in the suit, against the order of dismissal of their appeal bearing MCA No. 143 of 1998 passed by the Additional District Judge, Jalandhar affirming the order dated 9-2-1998 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar, who had dismissed their Miscellaneous Application No. 27 of 1997 moved under Order 39, Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) against the respondent Nos. 1 to 12 out of which respondent No. 1 was the plaintiff in the main suit while respondents No. 2 to 12 were arrayed as parties to the application filed by the petitioners under Order 39, Rule 2-A of the Code. Along with the revision petition an application for condonation of delay in filing the revision petition under S. 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 1963 Act) has also been filed.

2. In order to get a complete picture of the controversy involved, essential facts have to be noticed, Sukhbir Singh, respondent No. 1 in the present petition, had filed civil Suit No. 186 of 1993 for per



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top