SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1109

V.S.AGGARWAL
Rishi Pal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

V.S.AGGARWAL, J.

1. Smt. Chandrawli, complainant made a report asserting that she is not owner of 67 kanals and 9 marlas of land in village Kalayat, District Kaithal. She is in possession of the same. Petitioner Rishi Pal along with Laxman Dass and Sushil Kumar Goyal got a forged and false decree passed from the Court of Subordinate Judge First Class, Kaithal. The Court was deceived. The complainant had never appeared in theCourt and was falsely identified. On 8-3-1991, petitioner in connivance with the Patwari got effected the mutation on basis of the said decree. The petitioner took a tractor on the said land for taking forcible possession. The complainant asserts that she had never appeared in the Court of Subordinate Judge at Kaithal nor thumb marked any statement. In these circumstances, it was claimed that offence punishable under Sections 418/420/468/471/120-B of Indian Penal Code have been committed by the petitioner and others. On basis of the above said complaint, First Information Report has been registered at Police Station Kalayet, District Kaithal.

2. The petitioner seeks the quashing of the First Information Report alleging that a valid decree has been passed













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top