PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
G.C.Garg, J.
Lachhman Dass Arora
Versus
Ganeshi Lal
Election Petition No. 26 of 1996,
Decided On : JULY 16, 1996
ELECTION PETITION - LIMITATION - FILING OF ELECTION PETITION - PERIOD OF LIMITATION - NOTIFICATION BY HIGH COURT - INTERPRETATION - ELECTION PETITION FILED AFTER EXPIRY OF LIMITATION PERIOD - DISMISSAL OF PETITION.
Fact of the Case:
An election petition was filed 52 days after the declaration of the election results, beyond the 45-day limitation period prescribed under Section 81(1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951. The petitioner argued that the High Court was closed for summer vacations and no Judge was designated to deal with election petitions during that period, and therefore, the limitation period should be extended.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the notification issued by the High Court clearly stated that the Court would remain open for the purpose of filing and hearing election petitions during the summer vacations. The court also noted that the petitioner had not presented any evidence to show that the Registry of the High Court was closed during the vacation period.
Issues: Whether the election petition was filed within the limitation period prescribed under Section 81(1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the election petition was barred by limitation and dismissed it. The court relied on the following legal principles: * Section 81(1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 prescribes a 45-day limitation period for filing an election petition. * A notification issued by the High Court stated that the Court would remain open for the purpose of filing and hearing election petitions during the summer vacations. * The petitioner had not presented any evidence to show that the Registry of the High Court was closed during the vacation period.
Final Decision: The election petition was dismissed as barred by limitation.
G.C.Garg, J.
1. Election to the 8th Haryana Legislative Assembly was notified calling upon various constituencies of Haryana Legislative Assembly including Sirsa (82-Legislative Assembly Constituency) to elect its representatives. The last date for filing nomination papers was notified as 3.4.1996. The date of poll was notified as 27.4.1996. Counting Was to commence on 8.5.1996. After withdrawal of nomination papers within the time- allowed, a total of 76 candidates remained in the field as the contesting candidates in respect of Sirsa (82-Legislative Assembly Constituency). The counting of votes started on 8.5.1996 and continued for two days. Result was ultimately declared by the Returning Officer on 10.5.1996 at about 5 p.m. Respondent No. 1, the returned candidate polled 35419 votes whereas the election petitioner Lachhman Dass Arora polled 31599 votes. Gopi Chand another candidate polled 22848 votes and Lekh Raj still another candidate polled 2045 votes whereas the other candidates polled less than 100 votes. The Returning Officer declared Ganeshi Lal, respondent No. 1 as returned candidate by a margin of 3820 votes on 10.5.1996. This undisputedly the date of election of the returned candidate for the purpose of Section 81 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (for short the Act).
2. Section 81 of the Act provides that election petition calling in question any election may be presented by any candidate of such election within 45 days from the date of election of the returned candidate. The period of 45 days from the date of election i.e. 10.5.1996 for the purpose of filing election petition, admittedly, expired on 25.6.1996 and the election petition was presented by the petitioner through his advocate Shri Sanjiv Walia, at 3.50 p.m. on 1.7.1996, in the Registry of this Court. The election petition was thus filed after the expiry of period of limitation.
3. In response to notice of the election petition, only Ganeshi Lal the returned candidate filed written statement. A preliminary objection was raised that the election petition was not instituted within the prescribed period of limitation as provided in Section 81(1) of the Act and was, therefore, liable to be dismissed. It was highlighted that the High Court vide its notification No. 313/Genl. XVII3. dated 27.11.1995 specifically notified for general information that the Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh will be closed for Civil business except for hearing Election Petitions or any other matter arising out of the Representation of People, Act, 1951, on account of long vacations in the year 1996 from June 1 to June 36, 1996 (both days inclusive). The contesting respondent also raised various other pleas and controverted the allegations made in the election petition.
4. It may also be noticed that Registry of this Court also, at the time of scrutiny of the election petition, pointed out that the election petition has been filed on the 52nd day of the declaration of result and was, therefore, barred by time in view of the provisions of Section 81(1) of the Act.
5. Election petitioner filed replication and on the oral prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner it was taken on record after supplying a copy thereof to the opposite counsel.
6. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1, the returned candidate submitted that the election petition deserves to be dismissed on the ground that ii has been presented after the expiry of period of limitation as prescribed under the Act and thus after hearing learned counsel for the parties, a preliminary issue was framed to the following effect.
Whether the election petition has been filed within the period of limitation? O.P. Parties.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner placing heavy reliance on notification No. 312-Genl./XVII. 3 dated 27.11.1995 published in the Chandigarh Administration Gazette on 1.1.1996 submitted that vide this notification, the calendar of holidays in the year commencing 1.1.1996 to 31.12.1
Hari Shankar Tripathi V/s. Shiv Harsh And Ors.
Hukumdev Narain Yadav V/s. Lalit Narain Mishra
Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. V/s. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.