SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 958

R.S.MONGIA
Mohd. Ranjha – Appellant
Versus
Punjab Wakf Board – Respondent


Judgment

R.S.Mongia, J.

1. A suit was filed by petitioner Mohd. Ranjha before the trial Court seeking permanent injunction restraining Punjab Wakf Board from changing the nature of the alleged graveyard or making any type of construction or encroachment over the alleged graveyard measuring about 65 Kanals 16 Marias comprised in Khasra numbers mentioned in the plaint. It was also prayed that respondent-Wakf Board be restrained from alienating the property in dispute in any manner. An application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure was also moved along with the suit. On February 19, 1995 the trial Court declined the application for the interim injunction. Petitioner filed an appeal before the Additional District Judge, Jalandhar, who initially granted ex parte order of status quo on February 16, 1995. The respondents herein have moved an application for vacating that exparte status quo order dated February 16, 1995. By the impugned order, the application of the respondents for vacating the ex parte stay order of status quo has been allowed leading the petitioner to file the present revision petition. The learned appellate Court has observed in its order that pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top