G.S.SINGHVI, S.S.SUDHALKAR
Ram Sarup – Appellant
Versus
Din Dayal – Respondent
1. In this revision petition, i.e., Civil Revision No. 2269 of 1992 and in Civil Revision No. 2216 of 1987 and 2456 of 1989, the question which is required to be decided is that in cases, where the landlord gets the premises vacated from the tenant on the ground of building having become unfit and unsafe for human habitation, and on reconstruction of the building, whether the tenant is entitled to be reinducted as a tenant in the newly constructed -building and if so, on what terms and conditions. Sub-sec. (3)(a)(iii) of S. 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to is the Punjab Act) gives a right to the landlord to seek eviction of the tenant, which reads as under :-
"(iii) in the case of any building or rented land, if he requires it to carry out any building work at the instance of the Government or local authority or any, Improvement Trust under some improvement or development scheme or if it has become unsafe or unfit for human habitation. "
This very provision is also contained in verbatim in sub-secs. (3)(c) and (6) of S. 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Haryana Act)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.