SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 681

N.K.SODHI, G.S.SINGHVI
Court On Its Oun Motion – Appellant
Versus
N. S. Kanwar – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.SINGHVI, J.

1. This case is illustrative of the plight of low paid employees who are made to litigate more than once for enforcing their basic and bare rights in relation to their conditions of service. This is also illustrative of the growing malady in the administration and the attitude of defence of the Court orders by the administrative authorities who are unmindful of the fact that their action and omission of not complying the Court orders or violating the same leads to the denigration of entire constitutional system.

2. Thakur Singh and others filed Writ Petition No. 1093 of 1990 with a prayer for issue of a direction to the respondents to regularise their service. This petition was disposed of by the High Court on 3/12/1992 with a direction to the respondents to consider/reconsider the claim of the petitioner for regularisation in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Haryana V/s. Piara Singh, 1992 (4) SCC 118 . The Court observed that the petitioners be granted relief of regularisation only if they fall within the purview of the judgment or any other subsequent instructions issued by the State Government in this behalf.

3. Although order dated














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top