SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(P&H) 361

UJAGAR SINGH
Sumer Chand Alias Sumer Nath – Appellant
Versus
Sandhuran Rani – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioner has filed Criminal Revision No. 410 of 1987 and Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2500-M of 1987 and both these petitions are being disposed of in this order.

2. Sandhuran Rani, wife of Sumer Chand and Anju Bala, his daughter, the present respondents filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of maintenance allowance against Sumer Chand, the present petitioner. During the pendency of that petition, an application was made on behalf of the respondents for interim maintenance and after the whole matter was gone into by the trial Court, Sandhuran Rani, respondent was held to be not entitled to any interim maintenance and so far as her application was concerned, it was declined. The trial Court, however, allowed interim maintenance to Anju Bala, respondent No. 2 at the rate of Rs. 200.00 per month, Sandhuran Rani, respondent No. 1 filed a revision petition before the Sessions Court which came up for hearing before the Additional Sessions Judge. The present petitioner also went in revision against the order of the trial Court granting interim maintenance to respondent No. 2 and both those revision petitions were heard finally by














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top