SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 377

P.K.JAIN
Ranjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bhup Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. Ranjit Singh has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for quashing the order dated 30-11-1994 (Annexure P. 1), passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hissar, under Section 138 of the Code and the order dated 14-8-1995 (Annexure P. 2) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hissar, whereby the order (Annexure P. 1) has been affirmed in revision.

2. The facts in brief are that Bhup Singh, respondent therein, moved an application under Section 133 of the Code before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. Hissar, stating therein that he had been allotted a plot by the Consolidation Department in the year 1956 on which he had constructed his residential house. According to the averments in the application, there is a public thoroughfare in front of his said house which passage is being used by him for approaching his house, the drain water of his house and a drain pass through that lane and falls into the johar as the slant of the lane is towards the johar. It was alleged that Ranjit Singh, the petitioner herein. illegally encroached upon the shamlat land including the thoroughfare in question as a result of













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top