SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(P&H) 1247

G.S.SINGHVI
Dropti Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.Singhvi, J.

1. The only question which requires adjudication in this writ petition is whether the respondents are right in declining the regularisation Of service of the petitioner as Sewing Teachress on the ground that confidential reports of the petitioner were not available.

2. After having secured necessary qualifications for appointment as Sewing Teachress the petitioner was appointed on the post of Sewing Teachress (Craft Teachress) under the Panchayat Samitt, Shahbad with effect from 30.3.1979 where she worked upto 28.9.1982. Thereafter she worked as Sewing Teachress under the District Rural Development Agency, Kurukshetra, between 9.10.1982 to 30.6.1984 and 30.11.1984 to 31.3.1985. With effect from 3,4.1985 the petitioner was appointed as ad hoc Sewing Teachress in Panchayat Samiti Pehowa on the consolidated salary of Rs. 525/- per month. The Government of Haryana took a policy decision to regularise the services of Sewing Teachresses having experience of three years or more. In furtherance of this policy decision, circular letters dated 18.2.1983 and 4.5.1983 were issued by the Government directing all the competent authorities to take steps for regularisation




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top