R.P.SETHI, S.S.SUDHALKAR
Ishwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
R.P.SETHI,J.
1. In pursuance to the directions given by the Supreme Court in M. C. Mehta V/s. Union of India (1992) 3 SCC 256, Government of Haryana issued notification dated 4-8-1992 wherein it was declared that the State Government was of the opinion that the stone crushers units in the State of Haryana have been causing grave air pollution and hazards to traffic and human health, which necessitated that they be not located Within the parameters as laid down in the Haryana Government Notification dated 9-6-1992. On 18-12-1992 respondent-Government again issued notification whereby earlier notification dated 9-6-1992 was amended and new parameters were prescribed. As despite judgment from the Supreme Court and notification issued in consequence thereof, stone crushers were not shifted from Naurangpur village, district Gurgaon, the petitioner filed this writ petition in public interest for issuance of direction to the respondents to close stone crushing business in village Naurangpur, District Gurgaon with immediate effect and shift their business to the area earmarked for the purpose of stone crushing.
2. It is submitted that on account of non-shifting of the stone crusher
Chaitanya V/s. State Of Karnataka
K. R. Shenoy V/s. Udipi Municipality
M. C. Mehta V/s. Union Of India
M. C. Mehta V/s. Union Of India
S. P. Gupta V/s. Union Of India
Sheela V/s. State Of Maharashtra, Air 1983 Sc 378, Veera V/s. State Of Bihar
Rural Litigation And Entitlement Kendra V/s. State Of Uttar Pradesh
Sachidanand Pandey V/s. The State Of West Bengal
Subhash Kumar V/s. State Of Bihar
Bandhua Mukti Morcha V/s. Union Of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.