V.RAMASWAMI, UJAGAR SINGH, G.R.MAJITHIA
Kesar Chand Resident Of Village Naroli – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
G.R.MAJITHIA, J.
1. This bunch of writ petitions (C. W. P. Nos. 1499/83, 2864/83, 4125, 4908, 1530, 2319 and 4216 of 1984, 1039, 5141, 41, 3678, 4072, 4712, 4720, 4721, 5584 of 1985 and 1171/87) will be disposed of by a common judgement.
2. We have referred to the facts as given in CWP No. 2864/1983.
3. The factual matrix has little relevance to the issues raised and canvassed at the hearing. However, a brief resume of the facts is necessary to appreciate the points urged.
4. The petitioner joined as a Beldar on August 1, 1951, as a work-charged employee in the office of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Pathankot. He had a regular service, without any break, from the date of joining the service till the date of his superannuation - October 3, 1977.
5. After his superannuation, the petitioner represented to the respondents for grant of pensionary benefits for the reasons that he had served the department regularly and the post against which he was appointed was a regular post. Even in the Industrial Award dated June 1, 1972 (between the Workman and the Chief Engineer, PWD (B and R), Establishment Branch, Punjab, Patiala) which was published in the Government Gazette dated July 14
Ram Krishna Dalmia V/s. S.R. Tendolkar
Ramana Dayaram Shetty V/s. International Airport Authority Of India
Smt. Maneka Gandhi V/s. Union Of India
State Of Punjab V/s. Jqbal Singh
Ajay Hasia V/s. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
D.S. Nakara V/s. Union Of India
Deokinandan Prasad V/s. State Of Bihar
Des Raj V/s. State Of Punjab Reported
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.