SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(P&H) 680

R.N.MITTAL, M.M.PUNCHHI
Hukam Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.PUNCHHI, J.

1. Almost a decade ago the State of Haryana, as would be evident, went on an acquiring spree in the revenue estate of Panipat, a Sub-Divisional town in district Karnal (Haryana). Taking aid of the Land Acquisition Act. 1894, (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) it took within a span of about 10 months large tracts of urban land in three strokes by issuance of three successive notifications under Sec.4 of the Act. These are referred to in the succeeding paragraphs.

2. On Oct. 29, 1976. notification under Sec.4 of the Act was issued to acquire 5 Acres 5 Kanals and 5 Marlas of land to build a Handloom Complex. On Nov. 4. 1976, notification under Sec.4 of the Act was issued to acquire 11 Bighas 14 Biswas of land (approximately 2 Acres and 3 Kanals of land) for the purpose of building Staff Quartes for the Market Committee. Panipat. Lastly, on Aug. 30, 1977, notification under Sec.4 of the Act was issued to acquire a large chunk of land measuring 64.50 Acres and 173.39 Acres, total 237.89 Acres, to be utilised for residential, commercial and industrial purposes for floating Urban Estates. The lands involved were either in Taraf Rajputan of Taraf Afghana. These t






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top