R.N.MITTAL, M.M.PUNCHHI
Hukam Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
M.M.PUNCHHI, J.
1. Almost a decade ago the State of Haryana, as would be evident, went on an acquiring spree in the revenue estate of Panipat, a Sub-Divisional town in district Karnal (Haryana). Taking aid of the Land Acquisition Act. 1894, (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) it took within a span of about 10 months large tracts of urban land in three strokes by issuance of three successive notifications under Sec.4 of the Act. These are referred to in the succeeding paragraphs.
2. On Oct. 29, 1976. notification under Sec.4 of the Act was issued to acquire 5 Acres 5 Kanals and 5 Marlas of land to build a Handloom Complex. On Nov. 4. 1976, notification under Sec.4 of the Act was issued to acquire 11 Bighas 14 Biswas of land (approximately 2 Acres and 3 Kanals of land) for the purpose of building Staff Quartes for the Market Committee. Panipat. Lastly, on Aug. 30, 1977, notification under Sec.4 of the Act was issued to acquire a large chunk of land measuring 64.50 Acres and 173.39 Acres, total 237.89 Acres, to be utilised for residential, commercial and industrial purposes for floating Urban Estates. The lands involved were either in Taraf Rajputan of Taraf Afghana. These t
Collector Of Lakhimpur V/s. Bhuban Chandra Dutta
Smt. Padma Uppal V/s. State Of Punjab
State Of Punjab V/s. Krishan Lal
Spl. Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore V/s. T. Adinarayana Shetty
Prithvi Raj Taneja V/s. State Of Madhya Pradesh
Smt. Kausalya Devi Bogra V/s. Land Acquisition Officer. Aurangabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.