SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(P&H) 81

MEHAR SINGH, P.D.SHARMA
Nathu Ram Nohar Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Mehar Singh, J.

1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by firm Nathu Ram Nohar Chand of Dhuri against four respondents, namely, the State of Punjab, the Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab, the Assessing Authority (the Excise and Taxation Officer), and the Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer, Barnala in Sangrur district, respectively 1 to 4, for a writ, direction or order quashing the notice dated March 9 and 10, 1959, by respondent 3 to the petitioner-firm under Section 11(2) of the Pepsu General Sales Tax Ordinance, 2006 Bk (Pepsu Ordinance No. 33 of 2006 Bk).

2. The petitioner-firm carries on kiryana business at Dhuri. It filed the quarterly sales tax returns under Section 11 of Pepsu Ordinance No. 33 of 2006 Bk for the period 1st April, 1955, to 31st March, 1956. It also made a deposit of Rs. 2,126.76 nP. as sales tax according to the returns made. The last quarter of the year for which it filed returns ended on 31st March, 1956.

3. On March 9 and 10, 1959, respondent 3 issued notice in Form S.T. XIV, copy annexure A, to the petitioner-firm calling upon it to appear before him on a given date and time and to produce its accounts and documents













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top