SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(P&H) 39

TEK CHAND, S.B.CAPOOR, P.C.PANDIT
Punjab Distilling Industries, Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Simla – Respondent


Judgment

Tek Chand, J.

1. The following four questions of law have been referred to the Full Bench.-

"(1) Whether the provisions of section 2(6A)(d) of the Indian Income-tax Act are ultra vires the Central Legislature?

(2) Whether the accumulated profits amounting to Rs. 4,69,244--13-0 could be deemed to have been distributed on the reduction of the capital from Rs. 25 lakhs to Rs. 15 lakhs within the meaning of section 2(6A)(d) of the Indian Income-tax Act?

(3) Whether the amount of Rs. 11,687-3-0 received by the assessee as security deposit on account of empty bottles could be considered as Capital Gains?

(4) Whether the accumulated profits could be considered as dividend deemed to have been distributed in the assessment year 1955-56 in view of the certificate granted by the Registrar of Companies under S. 61(4) of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 , or could be considered as dividend deemed to have been distributed in the assessment year 1956-57 because the debits of refunds were actually made in the accounts of the share-holders and the refunds were actually granted to the share-holders during the accounting period of the assessment year 1956-57."

2. The assessee is the Punjab Dist






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top