1. The award made by the Industrial Tribunal, Delhi, on 19th of November 1959 has been challenged by way of these writ proceedings under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. Anayat Ali, Lapoor Chand Jain and Jodh Singh had a dispute with their employer Khadi Gramodyog Bhawan and the matter was referred to the Tribunal for adjudication under Section 10 and 12 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . According to the findings of the Tribunal the termination of Jodh Singhs services was valid and justified and he was not entitled to any relief. In the case of Anayat Ali and Lapoor Chand Jain, the Tribunal held that their services had been wrongfully terminated. The relief accorded to Anayat Ali by the Tribunal was that he should be granted compensation equivalent to six months remuneration which he would have got if his services had not been so terminated. No relief was given by the Tribunal to Lapoor Chand Jain as the dispute qua him did not fall within the ambit of an industrial dispute as defined in Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

3. The present petition has been pressed only as regards Anayat Ali and Lapoor Chand Jain. So far as the case of Anaya