SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 1035

S.D.ANAND
Arpana Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Sharma – Respondent


JudgmentJudgment

S.D.Anand, J.

1. The respondent-husband filed a plea under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act for annulment of the marriage. The averments, in the course of the petition, were as under :-

2. The respondent-husband and the appellant-wife had their business premises adjacent to each other. They developed friendly relationship. The appellant- wife requested the respondent-husband to agree to the performance of a mock marriage in order to enable her to wriggle out of the predicament of having to undergo marriage with a boy whom her parents had selected for her and with whom she did not want to enter into a matrimonial alliance. For that purpose, the appellant took respondent-husband and few others to the residence of respondent No. 2 who provided them the bridal wear. The mock marriage was gone into in the presence of respondents No. 3 and 4 who are real sons of respondent No. 2. They had reached the spot with camera in order to able to click the pictures evidencing the Anand Karj ceremony. The parties went their separate ways thereafter. The marriage of respondent-husband was fixed thereafter with another girl. That marriage could not be gone through as girl side peo


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top