SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 1076

NIRMALJIT KAUR
M/s Gawritex Industries Limited, Panchkula – Appellant
Versus
Sqn. LGurdial Singh (Retd. ) – Respondent


JudgmentJudgment

Nirmaljit Kaur, J.

1. The facts, in short, are that the lease deed dated 01-01-2004 was executed between the landlord Sqn. Ldr. Gurdial Singh and other respondents and the petitioner-tenant, on the other side. The lease money, to be paid by the petitioner-tenant was Rs.1,11,000/- per month payable in advance by the 7th of each calendar month. The lease was for a period of five years but terminable at any time, by either of the parties, by giving three months notice in writing. In accordance with Clause 8 of the lease deed, the petitioner decided to vacate the premises and terminated the lease by sending notice dated 19.07.2004. The petitioner-tenant separately issued Legal notice dated 26.08.2004 and a communication dated 18.10.2004, informing respondent No.1 that the petitioner-tenant was vacating the premises on 19.10.2004. After the vacation of the tenanted premises on 19.10.2004, another communication dated 20-10-2004 and 06-11-2004 was sent, informing the landlord-respondents that he had vacated the tenanted premises.

2. The respondent-landlord, inspite of vacating the premises by the tenant, filed civil Suit for possession by way of ejectment and for recovery




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top