SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 176

RAJESH BINDAL
Shri Jai Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sardar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Rajesh Bindal, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition is for setting aside the order dated 16.9.2003, passed by Additional District Judge, Rohtak, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for correction of decree sheet dated 26.10.1995 in Civil Appeal No. 25 of 1995, was dismissed.

2. Briefly, the facts are that one Shri Pandit Ram Singh took loan from the office of Deputy Commissioner, Rohtak in 1954. As he failed to repay the same, recovery proceedings were initiated and the property owned by him was put to public auction. The petitioner, being highest bidder, was successful in the auction proceedings. The entire amount of auction money of Rs. 8,000/- was deposited by the petitioner with the authorities way back in the 1973, when the auction took place. The possession of the property was delivered to the petitioner and he is in actual physical possession thereof since 27.7.1973. As the letter of ownership was not issued in favour of the petitioner and the entries in the revenue records were not changed, the suit was filed, which was dismissed by the trial court. However, the learned lower appellate court decreed the same on 26.10.1995. The application came to be file













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top