SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1520

VIRENDER SINGH
Satnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Virender Singh, J.

1. Satnam Singh son of Nain Singh stands convicted under sec. 304 IPC by impugned judgment of learned Additional Sessions judge, Ferozepur dated 24/4/1991. He has been sentenced to undergo RI for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.500.00, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for three months.

2. Alongwith the present appellant, his two brothers Munsha Singh, Surjit Singh and mother Kartaro Bai were also booked but they stand acquitted. The State has not preferred any appeal against their acquittal. Jatto Bai is the deceased in this case.

3. The facts of the prosecution case are that on 15/5/1990 Jatto Bai (since deceased) received information from her grandsons that when they were returning from the school they were beaten by the sons of Nain Singh. Jatto Bai went to the house of Nain Singh to reprimand them. In the street Kartaro Bai met her and Jatto Bai reprimanded her. Both had exchanged abuses. It is then the case of the prosecution that Kartaro Bai asked her sons to teach a lesson to Jatto Bai for reprimanding her. Thereupon the present appellant and his brother Munsha Singh came from their house. The present appellant allegedly gave


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top