SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1156

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Manti – Appellant
Versus
Sarwati Devi – Respondent


Judgment

Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.

1. The respondents filed a suit claiming title in the suit property on the basis of inheritance to the estate of Dalip Chand and Mokhi who died issue-less. Pedigree table showing the relationship between the parties as mentioned in the judgment of the trial Court is extracted below:-

@TAB9 = 1. Mata

Chand : Ml Manohari (widow)

M2 Manti

M3 Biro

M4 Shanti =Rani

M5 Prithi =Ramkumars

widow died

issue-less.

M6 Kamlesh =K1 (Pavan)

K2 (Sat Parkash)

K3 (Tara Devi)

K4 (Darshana Devi)

(Defendants)

Deyot 2. Fateh1. ChameliR1 (Girdhar)

Ram Chand2. LadoR2 (Mahavir)

3. RamchanderR3 (Kam la-widow)

R4 (Krishna)

4. Ishwar11. Sarbati

5. Desh Raj12. Niranjan

6. Dev Raj13. Kusum

(Plaintiffs)

3. Dalip (Died issue-less)

4. Mokhi (Died issue-less)

Case of the plaintiffs (heirs of Fateh Chand) is that they were owners in possession of 1/3rd share of land measuring 212 kanals 8 marlas and land measuring 88 kanals 8 marlas and mutation pertaining to succession to the estate of deceased Dalip dated 20.1.1996 and mutation dated 29.6.1967 regarding succession to














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top